Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to footer

Shane Jackson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Shane Jackson
    Participant

      Commissioner Fox,

      I agree with you that we are both strong supporters of the First Amendment and the importance of free speech in the public square. Where I believe we differ is in how that principle applies within the context of deliberation among elected officials.

      I think it is important to distinguish between government suppression of speech and political disagreement. When one commissioner questions the relevance of a topic or whether it falls within the proper jurisdiction of this body, is that repression by government—or is it simply part of legislative discourse? If disagreement among commissioners is treated as suppression, it becomes difficult to see how meaningful debate can occur at all.

      I do not believe the concept of a “heckler’s veto” applies to discourse between elected officials. If the Chair were to prevent you from speaking due to anticipated audience reaction, that would clearly implicate First Amendment concerns. By contrast, disagreement or criticism from another commissioner does not approach a violation of free speech — even if raised voices occur. I also do not think it is fair to characterize Commissioner Rawls’ comments as heckling or jeering.

      While I do not support any effort to censor you or prevent you from raising issues you care about, I do believe we have an obligation to distinguish between matters that Knox County can act upon and broader national debates that fall outside our authority. Participation in 287(g), for example, is under the purview of the Knox County Sheriff, not County Commission. Raising issues over which we lack control risks placing commissioners in the position of taking symbolic or partisan stances that do not lead to actionable outcomes or strengthen working relationships.

      We have many substantive and productive debates on issues squarely within our responsibility—budget priorities, zoning decisions, and long-term county growth. Focusing our energy there is the best way to serve the people who elected us.

      I look forward to your presentation(s) in February and to engaging through questions and discussion consistent with Commission rules and the principles of free speech we both value.

      — Shane

      in reply to: IMPORTANT NOTICE PLEASE RESPOND TODAY #6178
      Shane Jackson
      Participant

        Yes

        in reply to: Invitation to Knox County Emergency Management Agency #4929
        Shane Jackson
        Participant

          I am available on the afternoon of the 14th. Anytime on the 21st. I’m not available on December 5th

          in reply to: Legislative Priorities Breakfast #4776
          Shane Jackson
          Participant

            TDOT Investment:

            Northshore is a state highway in most of West Knoxville. A study is requested to determine the viability of straightening the road and expanding its lanes to 3 or 4 lanes with dedicated bike lanes and wide sidewalks. There are many people who walk and bike Northshore daily, and there is no shoulder on either side.

            I-140 (Pellissippi Parkway) need to begin planning for expansion to 6 lanes across to improve traffic flow to Oak Ridge, as the area grows its employment.

          Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)