Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to footer

Kim Frazier

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 56 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Request of approval for special called meeting #4601
    Kim Frazier
    Participant

      Yes

      in reply to: Non-consent for June voting meeting #4491
      Kim Frazier
      Participant

        Madam Chair,

        Please return agenda item #33 back to consent. I am satisfied with the discussion held at the review mtg.

        Please keep agenda item #22 on non-consent as we will hear from KCS at the regular voting meeting.

        in reply to: Agenda Review Meeting – June #4489
        Kim Frazier
        Participant

          Please pull agenda items 22 and 32

          in reply to: Comp Plan Discussion #4323
          Kim Frazier
          Participant

            Please rescind:

            Page 59. Add section To Support This Policy: Suggest adding a new action item as inspired by the Middle TN Coalition of 9 Counties – “Greater Nashville Regional Council” – that this is just good data to consider. Additional language to read: “Further maintain a group of GIS layers that depict Environmentally Sensitive Areas including prime agricultural soil, historic resources, floodways & floodplains, Hillside / Ridgetop Protection Area, rare and endangered species, protected areas, conservation areas, surface water, wetlands, and other pertinent features, and use this map layer when evaluating plan amendments, rezonings, and development plans.”

            Director Brooks states that Knox County currently does this, so this may be unnecessary. Planning Staff will review and provide guidance.

            in reply to: Comp Plan Discussion #4321
            Kim Frazier
            Participant

              I mentioned that I would provide a sample policy regarding recreational space. This is from Germantown:

              https://library.municode.com/tn/germantown/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH17SU_ARTIIIMIDEST_S17-60PA

              in reply to: Comp Plan Discussion #4314
              Kim Frazier
              Participant

                ITEMS RESCINDED from consideration

                Page 37. Rural Living. Land Use Mix. Primary Uses. Suggest adding language to clarify types of structures that are appropriate and are not. Original suggestions was to add “detached”. Director Brooks was asked to provide guidance. Frazier rescinds. “Residential, Single family detached”.

                ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION ON NON CONSENT REVISED BY AUTHOR
                Page 71. Updating and Tracking. Add language under TEN YEARS to read: “Schedule a major update to the Comprehensive Plan and review changes in suitability factors”.

                Page 72. Additional Implementation Actions. Criteria For Plan Amendment. (blue column)
                Amend number of criteria that apply from 1 to 2 in support of the recommendation from the consultants and leadership team to read: “If an obvious or significant error or omission in the Plan or if two or more criteria apply, it may be appropriate to update the Plan:”
                Add language in the last bullet point to read: “The proposed changes support the policies outlined on page 52 and 53, goals, objectives, and criteria of the Plan.”

                in reply to: Comp Plan Discussion #4306
                Kim Frazier
                Participant

                  The Greater Nashville Regional Council, March 2024 Conference “Implications of Regional Growth Trends” define environmentally sensitive areas as:

                  Environmentally Sensitive Areas:
                  • Prime Agricultural Soils
                  • National Register of Historic Places
                  • National Flood Hazard Floodways &
                  Floodplains
                  • Steep Slopes (>15%)
                  • Rare & Endangered Species
                  • Protected Areas & Conservation Areas
                  • Surface Waters
                  • Wetlands

                  in reply to: Comp Plan Discussion #4304
                  Kim Frazier
                  Participant

                    Link to the USGS soil map as requested:

                    https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/0767h/plate-1.pdf

                    in reply to: February Non-Consent Items #3996
                    Kim Frazier
                    Participant

                      Commissioners,

                      Here is the link to the proposed Future Land Use Map:

                      https://knoxgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/basic/index.html?appid=64d44f6354e349c9b4cf08470400f174

                      in reply to: October Non-Consent Items #3338
                      Kim Frazier
                      Participant

                        Madam Chair, please pull agenda item # 15 from consent.

                        in reply to: September Non-Consent Items #3291
                        Kim Frazier
                        Participant

                          Madam Chair,
                          Please pull from consent agenda item # 29, R-23-9-501

                          in reply to: Reorganization Meeting #3176
                          Kim Frazier
                          Participant

                            I will attend on Friday, September 1, 8:00am

                            in reply to: Tonight’s Meeting #3112
                            Kim Frazier
                            Participant

                              I agree. No need to make the trip.

                              in reply to: Budget Public Hearing / SS Input #3021
                              Kim Frazier
                              Participant

                                Monday, June 5th works best for me.

                                in reply to: April Non-Consent Items #2928
                                Kim Frazier
                                Participant

                                  Thank you, Madam Chair.

                                  In regards to agenda item #42. R-23-4-901, I offer the following:
                                  • This facilitates the expansion at Axle Logistics, which will almost double in size eventually having more than 1,000 employees with a current average earning of $117k a year.
                                  • The Sheriff will give up the current impound lot, the County will pave and improve it.
                                  • Axle will buy the land for the appraised value plus what Knox spends on improvements.
                                  • Axle bought land the Sheriff approved on Wheeler Street and will add improvements and two buildings to replace what the Sheriff is giving up. That cost will be deducted from the price paid to Knox, although it is more likely Axle ends up spending more.
                                  • Taxpayers won’t lose a penny, but this enables economic growth.
                                  • Great effort and cooperation by public and private sectors. Axle, County Finance, County Engineering and Public Works, the Sheriff’s Office and the Industrial Development Board have all worked together to make this happen.

                                  I would also like to bring attention to an observation of more recommended RB (General Residential) zonings. RB allows for multi-family use by right, has fewer landscaping requirements, and does NOT require a development plan.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 56 total)