Forum Replies Created
April 14, 2023 at 5:04 pm in reply to: April Non-Consent Items #2936
Please pull 28 from consent.
Yes to testFebruary 13, 2023 at 8:24 am in reply to: February Non-Consent Items #2702
Courtney, please pull items 12,16 and 26 from consent.
Also asking how “deep in the mud” do we want to go on discussion of any items on zoning during workshop? Would you prefer zoning discussion be held till next week?December 9, 2022 at 4:37 pm in reply to: December Non-Consent Items #2486
Please pull #37 and 38 from consent. Thank youOctober 15, 2022 at 8:38 pm in reply to: October Non-Consent #2286
Please pull #43 from consent. ThanksAugust 26, 2022 at 11:30 am in reply to: Commission Reorganization – Committees #2206
I would like to serve, first time, on retirement and pension and continue on rules ( only if slot available, am glad to give others a chance)August 10, 2022 at 7:33 pm in reply to: Reorganization #2180
YesJuly 14, 2022 at 3:23 pm in reply to: Merit System Reforms – DISCUSSION #2138
Got it, thanks for your work on this.
TerryJune 30, 2022 at 10:19 pm in reply to: PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE #2115
YesJune 23, 2022 at 4:45 pm in reply to: Merit System Reforms – DISCUSSION #2054
This was sent to me by a uniformed sheriff’s officer. I believe it deserves consideration. Thanks, Terry.
a. Section 9.5.1 labeled “General” has been removed and a new section, labeled under the new ordinance Sec42-67 Grievances which may be addressed by the Merit System Board. What is interesting is the removal of such terminology and rights for employees such as: “a grievance is defined as any perceived wrong, considered as grounds for complaint arising out of a personnel action” –
b. The new Sec 42-60, labeled Transfers – this section appears to have been closely rewritten, wherein it was added that the Sheriff can transfer employees from one position to another within and between classes of positions. What is interesting, as you refer to the exhibit A provided by Commissioner Jay, is that “as determined by the Sheriff” was added and “only under rules established by the merit system council” –
These two items alone should be alarming to any of you that wish to keep qualified, dedicated deputies employed to protect your constituents. What is being proposed is a total removal of protections of employees from political retaliation, as well as unstable leadership. We have seen in communities around us, Oak Ridge for example, what a leader can do to people’s lives that only signed up to work and protect the community. If you all do not thing more should be added to ensure that in 80 years someone cannot come in and move people, without cause, from positions which they have been trained in (which, mind you, costs taxpayer dollars) please feel free to be transparent so that those that can make changes in their lives can do so.June 17, 2022 at 1:42 pm in reply to: June Non-consent #2043
Please pull items #48 and #49 from consent
TerryMay 15, 2022 at 11:50 am in reply to: May Non-consent #1922
Got it…. Thanks!January 12, 2022 at 3:20 pm in reply to: Legislative Priorities #1715
Thanks for this listing. I am wondering on #4 what type of “protections” you were thinking about?December 10, 2021 at 11:13 am in reply to: December Non-consent Items #1669
I would like the add from parks and rec on naming facilities to be pulled from consent.
TerryNovember 19, 2021 at 10:30 am in reply to: Judicial Appointment #1644
Yes that works